The Approaches to Enhance Rural Teacher Competence in China's Lingui District
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
The objective of this research is to study the components of work competencies for rural teachers in Lingui County of China. The research is divided into three phases as follows: Phase 1 is a synthesis of competency models for rural teachers. Phase 2 surveyed the current competence status of rural teachers. Phase 3 is to design and create guidelines to increase the capacity of rural teachers. Population and Sample: This study used the Lingui District of China, which has approximately 76 primary and secondary schools with a total number of teachers of approximately 1,900, divided into 65 primary school groups and a total of approximately 1,000 teachers and 11 middle school groups. Total number of teachers is approximately 750 people. Research tools: Estimated questionnaires were used. 5 levels of Likert scale Research statistics: use averages, percentages, standard deviations. and summarize descriptive research statistics. Components of work competency for teachers include: Teachers have professional knowledge and abilities, educational and teaching abilities, and a good professional conduct. ,good personal characteristics, instructional design ,Educational operations are being carried out. , educational research, a good professional attitude, professional pride and professional ethics. Overall summary of the components of teacher professional competency is at a high level, with an average of 4.73.
Article Details
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Zhu Zhiyong, Cui Xuejuan. (2013). Leadership traits of excellent principals: an analysis from the perspective of media coverage. Journal of Education, September. (01), 100-110.
Liu Shuxian. (2018). Model construction and empirical analysis of the impact of organizational factors on female leadership in enterprises [J]. Business and Management. 4 (11), 72-7.
Taj F, Iqbal M. (2012). Strategy for Improving Leadership Skills of School Principals[J]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business.
House R J. (1971). A Path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly. 16 (3), 321-339.
Burns, J. M. (1978). leadership[M]. New York: Harper & Row.
Louis T. Benezet, Joseph. Katz, and Frances W. (1981). Magnusson. Style and Substance: Leadership and the College Presidency [M]. Washington D. C: American council on education.
Harris, Alma. (2012). Distributed leadership: implications for the role of the principal Journal[J] of Management Development. 31 (1), 7-17, 11p.
Shields, Carolyn M. (2010). Transformative Leadership: Working for Equity in Diverse Contexts[J] Educational Administration Quarterly. 46 (4), 558-589, 32p.
Leithwood K. (1994). Leadership for School Restructuring. [J]. Educational Administration Quarterly. 30 (4), 498-518.
S.E. Garvy. (1994). Principal leadership, faculty trust, teacher compliance, and school effectiveness[D]Rutgers the Stat. University of New Jersey-New Brunswick.
Estela M. Bensimon, Anna Neumann. (2000). What teams can do: How leaders use-and neglect to use their teams[A]M. Christopher brown II&James L. Rateliffe, etc. Organization&Governance in Higher Education (fifth edition)[C].Boston: Person Custom Publishing, 244-257.
Kerr C. (1982). The Uses of the University [M]. Harvard University Pr.
Clark, B. (1983). The Higher Education System: academic organization in cross-national perspective[M]. Los Angeles:University of California Press.