The Exploring Impact Mechanisms of Network Embedding on Innovation Performance in Chinese International Freight Forwarding Enterprises
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
This study aims to explore the influence mechanism of network embeddedness on business model innovation and enterprise innovation performance in Chinese international freight forwarding enterprises. The research is based on network embeddedness theory and supported by dynamic capability theory. The study population consists of Chinese international freight forwarding companies, with a sample of 10 companies selected from the "Top 100 National Freight Forwarders in China's International Freight Forwarding Ranking 2022" published by "Trade and Economic Network". Data was collected through questionnaire surveys and analyzed using empirical methods.
The research findings indicate that: 1) Network embeddedness has a significant positive impact on both business model innovation and enterprise innovation performance; 2) Business model innovation partially mediates the relationship between network embeddedness and enterprise innovation performance; 3) Dynamic capabilities significantly moderate the relationship between network embeddedness and business model innovation. Based on these results, it is suggested that Chinese international freight forwarding enterprises should focus on strengthening their network relationships and improving their dynamic capabilities to enhance their innovation performance. This research contributes to broadening the perspective on the relationship between network embeddedness and innovation performance, while providing strategic guidance for Chinese international freight forwarding enterprises to enhance their innovation capabilities in an increasingly globalized business environment.
Article Details
References
Abideen, A. Z., Sorooshian, S., Sundram, V. P. K., & Mohammed, A. (2023). Collaborative insights on horizontal logistics to integrate supply chain planning and transportation logistics planning–A systematic review and thematic map. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9 (2), 100066. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc. 2023.100066
Bachmann, N., & Jodlbauer, H. (2023). Iterative business model innovation: A conceptual process model and tools for incumbents. Journal of Business Research, 168, 114177. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114177
Boxu, Y., Xingguang, L., & Kou, K. (2022). Research on the influence of network embeddedness on innovation performance: Evidence from China's listed firms. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(3),100210.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik. 2022.100210
Codini, A. P., Abbate, T., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2023). Business Model Innovation and exaptation: A new way of innovating in SMEs. Technovation, 119, 102548. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.technovation.2022.102548
Corvello, V., Cimino, A., & Felicetti, A. M. (2023). Building start-up acceleration capability: A dynamic capability framework for collaboration with start-ups. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9 (3), 100104. https://doi.org/ 10. 1016/ j.joitmc.2023.100104
Coskun-Setirek, A., & Tanrikulu, Z. (2021). Digital innovations-driven business model regeneration: A process model. Technology in Society, 64, 101461. https://doi.org/ 10. 1016/j.techsoc.2020.101461
Deng, J., Zhao, Y., Li, X., Wang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Network Embeddedness, Relationship Norms, and Cooperative Behavior: Analysis Based on Evolution of Construction Project Network. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149 (9), 04023070.
Dong, J., & Chen, G. (2020). The impact of innovation network embeddedness and community awareness on firm innovation performance. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 37 (05), 77-86.
Fan, M., Huang,W., & Xiong, S. (2023). How enterprise interactions in innovation networks affect technological innovation performance: The role of technological innovation capacity and absorptive capacity. Plos one, 18 (3),1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0282540
Ge, C., Lv, W., & Wang, J. (2023). The impact of digital technology innovation network embedding on firms’ innovation performance: the role of knowledge acquisition and digital transformation. Sustainability, 15 (8), 6938. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1508 6938.
George, A. S., & Baskar, T. (2024). Driving Business Transformation Through Technology Innovation: Emerging Priorities for IT Leaders. Partners Universal Innovative Research Publication, 2 (4), 01-14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13286732
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology, 91 (3), 481-510.
Haaker, T., Ly, P. T. M., Nguyen-Thanh, N., & Nguyen, H. T. H. (2021). Business model innovation through the application of the Internet-of-Things: A comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research, 126, 126-136.
Heider, A., Gerken, M., van Dinther, N., & Hülsbeck, M. (2021). Business model innovation through dynamic capabilities in small and medium enterprises–Evidence from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Business Research, 130, 635-645. https:// doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.051
Hua, L., & Wu, Y. (2024). Strategic analysis of vertical integration in cross-border e-commerce logistics service supply chains. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 188, 103626. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.tre.2024.103626
Jiao, H., Yang, J., & Wang, P. (2021). Research on the role mechanism of data-driven firm dynamic capability: An analysis of the digital transformation process based on data lifecycle management. China Industrial Economics, (11), 174-192.
Kocaoglu,B. (2024). Digital Transformation in Logistics. In Logistics Information Systems: Digital Transformation and Supply Chain Applications in the 4.0 Era (pp. 1-35). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/66539 43832/80008
Li, X., & Liu, X. (2023). The impact of the collaborative innovation network embeddedness on enterprise green innovation performance. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1190697
Liu, J. and Xi, X. (2023), "When brokers start to fill structural holes: the cultural contingency of how entrepreneurs leverage structural holes to facilitate knowledge transfer", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 27 No. 10, pp. 2729-2753. https://doi.org /10.1108/ JKM-07-2022-0566
Ilyas, I. M., Kammerlander, N., Turturea, R., & van Essen, M. (2024). When business model innovation creates value for companies: A meta‐analysis on institutional contingencies. Journal of Management Studies, 61 (5), 1825-1883. https:// doi.org/10.1111/joms.129 66
Ouyang, L., & Bu, H. (2024). Unraveling the Dynamics of Network Embeddedness and Innovation Performance: Insights from China's International Freight Forwarding Industry. Kurdish Studies, 12 (1), 3174-3187.https://kurdishstudies.net/menu-script /index.php/KS/article/view/1609
Ouyang, L., & Bu, H. (2023). Dynamic Capabilities and Business Model Innovation: Navigating the Complex Interplay of Embeddedness and Innovation Performance in China's International Freight Forwarding Industry. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, 29 (4), 85-98. DOI: 10.46970/2023.29.4.06
Pramudyastuti, O. L., Iswanaji, C., Setyawan, S., Atika, A., & Simamora, A. J. (2023). Sustainable Business Model in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Study in Yogyakarta and Magelang. Ekuilibrium: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi, 18 (2), 213-226. DOI: 10.24269/ekuilibrium.v18i2.2023.pp213-226
Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 369-386.
Shan, P., Song, M., & Ju, X. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance: Is innovation speed a missing link? Journal of Business Research, 69 (2), 683-690.
Shipilov, A., Li, S. X., Bothner, M. S., & Truong, N. (2023). Network advantage: Uncontested structural holes and organizational performance in market crises. Strategic Management Journal, 44 (13), 3122-3154. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3538
Sun, C. (2023). The impact of smart city Internet firms network embeddedness on product innovation: a moderated mediating model. Soft Computing, 1-18. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00500-023-08104-0
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18 (7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Teece, D. J. (2020). Hand in glove: Open innovation and the dynamic capabilities framework. Strategic Management Review, 1 (2), 233-253. https://www.strategicmanagementre view.net/assets/articles/Teece%20OI.pdf
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509-533.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1), 35-67.
Wang, Y., Han, J. H., & Beynon-Davies, P. (2021). Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24 (1), 62-84.
Wang, C., Ren, X., Jiang, X., & Chen, G. (2024). In the context of mass entrepreneurship network embeddedness and entrepreneurial innovation performance of high-tech enterprises in Guangdong province. Management Decision, 62 (8), 2532-2557. https:// doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2023-0531
Wang, F., Su, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2024). The influence of collaborative innovation network characteristics on firm innovation performance from the perspective of innovation ecosystem. Kybernetes, 53 (4), 1281-1305. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2022-0553
Wang, J., & Lv, W. (2023). Research on the impact of green innovation network embeddedness on corporate environmental responsibility. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20 (4), 3433.
Wang, J., Wang, C., & Li, Y. (2024). Unlocking Creativity: The Impact of Inventors’ Knowledge Complementarity and Substitutability in Moderating Structural Holes. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-34.
Wang, Z., Lin, S., Chen, Y., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). Digitalization effect on business performance: role of business model innovation. Sustainability, 15 (11), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119020
Xie, X., & Wang, H. (2020). The impact mechanism of network embeddedness on firm innovation performance: A moderated mediation model based on non-R&D innovation. Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 34 (06), 13-28.
Yang, C. S., & Lin, M. S. M. (2023). The impact of digitalization and digital logistics platform adoption on organizational performance in maritime logistics of Taiwan. Maritime Policy & Management, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2023.2234911
Yang, L., & Li, K. (2024). Network embeddedness and innovation performance in freight forwarding: The mediating role of business model innovation. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 54 (2), 201-220.
Zhang, H., Chen, J., & Liu, Y. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and business model innovation in logistics firms: A moderated mediation model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122186.
Zhang, Y., Long, J., & Zhao, W. (2023). Building dynamic capabilities of small and medium-sized enterprises through relational embeddedness: evidence from China. Electronic Commerce Research, 23 (4), 2859-2906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09579-z
Zhao, J. (2023). Coupling open innovation: Network position, knowledge integration ability, and innovation performance. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14 (2), 1538-1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00932-z
Zheng, S. (2021). Research on the effect of knowledge network embedding on the dynamic capabilities of small and micro enterprises. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021 (1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5522788