Research on the Protection and Inheritance of Music Intangible Cultural Heritage in Liaoning Province, China

Main Article Content

Zhang Yining

บทคัดย่อ

          The unique geographical location of Liaoning, China, which is both by the sea and by the border, has nurtured the distinctive regional character and cultural forms of Liaoning, characterized by fiery and passionate, witty and humorous, and tolerant and grandiose. However, the musical intangible cultural heritage projects in Liaoning, as a rare cultural heritage, are facing an endangered situation under the impact of globalization and modernization. Therefore, this study will first focus on the 30 music-related intangible cultural heritage projects that have been listed in China's national and Liaoning provincial lists, and select 8 representative cases with representative features, such as Liaoning drum music, Qianshan temple music, and Fuxin East Mongolian short-tone folk songs, through a comprehensive evaluation of representativeness, timeliness, and effectiveness of protection and management, to conduct in-depth analysis on the project features, inheritors, audiences, and related policies and regulations. Through the methods of literature research, field investigation, and case analysis, combined with the theories of social identity, symbolic interaction, and the "5W" and "4R" strategy models, this study aims to explore a practical path for protection and inheritance.
          The article outlines the types, characteristics, and the important value of musical intangible cultural heritage projects in Liaoning Province. It also provides a detailed analysis of the current protection and inheritance status of musical intangible cultural heritage projects in Liaoning Province, including the protection mechanisms, inheritance situation, and audience acceptance rate. It reveals that there are some difficulties in the development of these projects, such as uneven development, fierce competition, unclear target audience, insufficient innovation, lack of long-term mechanisms, overemphasis on project application and underemphasis on protection, and a lack of cultural concepts.


 

Article Details

บท
บทความวิจัย

References

Arizpe, L. (2004). Intangible Culhural Heritage, Diversity and Coherence. Museum International, 56 (1), 130-136.

Bunten, A. C. (2008). Sharing culture or selling out?: developing the commodified persona in the heritage industry. American ethnologist, 35 (3), 380-395.

Blake, J. (2000). On Defining the Cultural Heritage. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49 (1), 61-85.

Baddely, A., Eysenck, M. W., & Anderson, M. C. (2009). Memory. Hove and New York. Psychology Press.

Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (2004). Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production. Museum

International, 56 (2), 52-65.

Khalid, M. S., & Chowdhury, M. S. A. (2018). Representation of intangible cultural heritage of Bangladesh through social media. Anatolia, 29 (2), 194-203.

Netleford, R. (2004). Migration. Transmission and Maintenance of the Intangible Heritage.

Museum International, 56 (1), 78-83.

Pietrobruno, S. (2014). Between narratives and lists: performing digital intangible heritage through global media. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20 (7-8), 742-759.