The Digital Leadership Model for Administrators of Vocational Education in Kaifeng City Under Henan Province
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
As the digital transformation of higher education in China continues to deepen, traditional leadership urgently needs to expand and shift towards digital leadership. As vocational education is a vital part of higher education, there is an urgent need to enhance the digital leadership capabilities of its administrators. In Kaifeng City, Henan Province, vocational education administrators struggle with integrating digital technologies, which limits their ability to lead and innovate in a fast-changing digital environment.
The objectives of this research were to: (1) Determine the components and sub-components of digital leadership for administrators of vocational colleges in Kaifeng City, Henan Province. (2) Propose a digital leadership model for these administrators.
The study’s population comprised 4,576 principals, deans, student counselors, and teachers from vocational colleges in Kaifeng City, Henan Province, China. A stratified random sampling method was employed, resulting in a sample of 363 participants. Data were collected using a questionnaire, and analyzed with descriptive statistics (percentage, arithmetic mean, standard deviation), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using statistical software.
The research findings revealed: (1) Four key components and 13 sub-components of digital leadership, derived from the conceptual framework, were identified. The four components are digital communication, digital vision, digital innovation, and digital collaboration. (2) The proposed digital leadership model for administrators of vocational colleges was consistent with the empirical data: Chi-square (χ2) = 103.97, Relative Chi-square (χ2/df) = 2.00, Degrees of Freedom (df) = 52, Statistical Significance (p) = 0.00, Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.96, Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.92, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.05. Components ranged from 0.82 to 0.98, while the sub-components/sub-components ranged from 0.65 to 0.87.
The study presents a validated digital leadership model specifically designed for vocational education administrators in Kaifeng City, Henan Province. By pinpointing and validating the essential components and sub-components of digital leadership, this research offers a practical framework that administrators can use to enhance their digital skills and lead their institutions more effectively in the digital era. This model provides a foundation for creating targeted professional development programs and strategic initiatives to promote digital leadership within vocational education settings.
Article Details
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Best, J. W. (1997). Research in education (8th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Cortellazzo, L., D’Amato, A., & Ponteggia, A. (2019). Digital communication in educational leadership: Insights and implications. Springer.
Daud, N. M., Nawi, N. M., & Yaakob, R. (2021). Digital collaboration: A key to effective educational leadership. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 3 (1), 107-121.
Fenwick, T., Landri, P., & Wright, T. (2021). Digital transformation in organizations: Uncertainty, complexity, and strategies for leaders. Palgrave Macmillan.
Huo, G. (2008). Leadership in informatization: A comprehensive review. Chinese Education & Society, 41 (5), 18-29.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2021). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hafiza, M. N., Ullah, F., & Rehman, F. U. (2021). Technological vision in educational leadership: Strategies and outcomes. Educational Leadership and Management Studies, 2 (1), 45-67.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2012). LISREL 9.2 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International, Inc.
Kim, J. O., Mueller, C. W., & Mueller, C. W. (2015). Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Liu, S., Rong, W., & Liu, L. (2018). Innovation climate and digital leadership: A theoretical model and empirical evidence. Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (3), 321-335.
Poonpong Sooksawang. (2021). Structural equation modeling and empirical data: Applications in educational research. Springer.
Promsri, C. (2019). Technical competence and digital resources in educational leadership: Insights and implications. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55 (4), 555-578.
Roman, L. A., & Chok, J. (2019). Collaborative digital platforms in educational leadership: Enhancing teamwork and communication. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67 (3), 467-485.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Tigre, J. R., De Sa, D. S., & Ferreira, M. A. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 on higher education governance in China. Higher Education Studies, 13 (1), 45-58.
Xie, Y., Chen, W., & Li, M. (2019). Digital transformation in education: Challenges and opportunities. Springer.
Yuan, Q. (2023). Intelligent education and digital transformation in vocational education: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Development Studies, 27 (3), 112-129.
Yusof, N. A. M., Ismail, S. M., & Latif, M. S. (2019). Data sharing in educational leadership: Challenges and strategies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22 (4), 456-472.
Zhao, L. (2016). Leadership in the digital age: A study of educational leaders in China. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 4 (2), 45-67.