Remote Teaching for Collaboration and Creative Problem-Solving Skills in Undergraduate Urban Science: A Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/educu.2023.28Keywords:
Remote Teaching, Collaboration, Creative Problem-Solving, Urban ScienceAbstract
Conventional urban studies pedagogy approaches rely on highly situated experience through site visits, ground surveys, and neighborhood engagement that require learning on the scene with social interaction. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted higher education worldwide, with undergraduate urban studies education being no exception. Such public health protocols have caused unfortunate disruptions but have also created unique opportunities for experimenting with new learning approaches augmented by information technology. This paper describes actions and reactions towards learning adaptation throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. This two-week learning unit challenged instructors’ facilitation of students’ collaborative and creative problem-solving skills. The findings reveal how we
(a) re-examined our pedagogical approaches, (b) designed the course for purposes of remote teaching, particularly for facilitating collaborative and creative problem-solving skills, and (c) implemented/taught the course. Finally, the authors conclude with suggestions for future problem-solving training and teaching strategies for instructors in ‘new normal’ learning environments.
References
ABET (2022). General criterion 3. Student outcomes from criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018–2019.https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3
Acuto, M., Parnell, S., & Seto, K. C. (2018). Building a global urban science. Nature Sustainability, 1, 2-4.
Addy, T. M., Dube, D., Croft, C., Nardolilli, J. O., Paynter, O. C., Hutchings, M. L., ... & Reeves, P. M. (2018). Integrating a serious game into case-based learning. Simulation & Gaming, 49(4), 378-400.
Allchin, D. (2013). Teaching the nature of science. Perspectives and Resources. St. Paul, MN: SHiPS Education Press.
Ananiadou, K., & Magdalean, C. (2009). 21st Century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD.
Arefi, M., & Triantafillou, M. (2005). Reflections on the pedagogy of place in planning and urban design. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25, 75-88.
Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478–485.
Berg, J. M. (2014). The primal mark: How the beginning shapes the end in the development of creative ideas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125(1), 1-17.
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi.
Carr, D., et al., (2021). Dog walking and the social impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on loneliness in older adults. Animals (Basel), 11, 1852.
Crawley, E. F., Hosoi, A., & Mitra, A. (2018). Redesigning undergraduate engineering education at MIT – the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) initiative. In the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference & Exhibition. Salt Lake City, Utah.
Crawley, E.F., & Hosoi, A. E (2019). Moving forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) program at MIT – building community, developing projects, and connecting with industry. In The ASEE Annual Conference & Exhibition. Tampa, FL.
Hélie, S., & Sun, R. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: a unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological review, 117(3), 994.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1-12.
Ishida, T., & Isbister, K. (2000). Digital cities: Technologies, experiences, and future perspectives. Springer.
Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284-301.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000) Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educ. Technol. Res. Develop., 48(4), 63–85.
Kontokosta, C. E. (2021). Urban informatics in the science and practice of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 41(4), 382-395.
Kulak, V., & Newton, G. (2014). A guide to using case‐based learning in biochemistry education. Biochemistry and molecular biology education, 42(6), 457-473.
Lai, Y., Yeung, W., & Celi, L. A. (2020). Urban intelligence for pandemic response: Viewpoint. JMIR Public Health Surveill, 6(2), e18873.
Lobo, J., et al. (2020). Urban science: Integrated theory from the first cities to sustainable metropolises. In Report Submitted to the NSF on the Present State and Future of Urban Science. NSF.
Marinoni, G., Van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on higher education around the world. In IAU Global Survey Report. International Association of Universities (IAU)
McWhirter, N., & Shealy, T. (2020). Case-based flipped classroom approach to teach sustainable infrastructure and decision-making. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 16(1), 3-23.
Mitra, A. et al. (2021). Pivot to remote teaching of an undergraduate interdisciplinary project-based program: Spring–Fall 2020. In The ASEE 2021 Annual Conference 2021: Montreal, Canada (Conference held online due to COVID-19 pandemic).
National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nedelkoska, L., & Quintini, G. (2018). Automation, skills use and training.
Neuwirth, L.S., Jović, S., & Mukherji, B. R. (2021). Reimagining higher education during and post-COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 27(2), 141-156.
Owczarczak-Garstecka, S. C., Graham, T. M., Archer, D. C., & Westgarth, C. (2021). Dog Walking before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown: Experiences of UK Dog Owners. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6315.
Pafka, E., & Dovey, K. (2017). Urban Design Pedagogy. In Mapping Urbanities (pp. 268-277). Routledge.
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133-141.
Rhodes, A., Wilson, A., & Rozell, T. (2020). Value of Case-Based Learning within STEM Courses: Is It the Method or Is It the Student?. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(3), ar44.
Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Res. J., 24(1), 92–96.
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. The interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9-20.
Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 2: What kind of learning for the 21st century. UNESCO Education Research and Foresight. Paris, France.
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have Higher Education Institutions responded to the challenge? Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6401-6419.
Vucinic, M., Vucicevic, M., & Nenadovic, K. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic affects owners walking with their dogs. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 48, 1-10.
Wengrowicz, N., Swart, W., Paul, R., Macleod, K., Dori, D., & Dori, Y. J. (2018). Students’ collaborative learning attitudes and their satisfaction with online collaborative case-based courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(4), 283-300.
World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. In Global Challenge Insight Report 2016. Geneva.
Yadav, A., Shaver, G. M., & Meckl, P. (2010). Lessons learned: Implementing the case teaching method in a mechanical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 55-69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
