Innovative Leadership of School Administrators Affecting the Effectiveness of Teachers' Learning Management under the Sisaket Provincial Office of Learning Encouragement

Abstract

This research consists purposes were 1. to examine the level of innovative leadership of school administrators and the level of teachers’ instructional management effectiveness 2. to investigate the relationship and influence of school administrators’ innovative leadership on teachers’ instructional management effectiveness 3. to explore the relationship between school administrators’ innovative leadership and teachers’ instructional management effectiveness and 4. to identify the aspects of innovative leadership that affect teachers’ instructional management effectiveness. This study employed a quantitative research design. The research instrument was a questionnaire. The sample consisted of 22 school administrators selected through purposive sampling and 169 teachers, yielding a total of 191 participants. The collected data were analyzed using statistical methods including mean, standard deviation, Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient, and multiple linear regression analysis. The research findings revealed that 1) The overall level of innovative leadership among administrators was at a high level (x̄ = 4.49, S.D. = 0.45) 2) The overall effectiveness of teachers’ instructional management under the Sisaket Provincial Office of Learning Encouragement was at a high level (x̄ = 4.42, S.D. = 0.39) 3) The relationship between the innovative leadership of school administrators and the effectiveness of teaching and learning management among teachers is positive and relatively high, statistically significant at the 0.01 level, with a correlation coefficient of 0.928 and 4) The results of the innovative leadership of school administrators and their impact on the effectiveness of teaching and learning management among teachers, using the Enter method for predictive regression analysis, show a high level of impact at 69.6% (R²= 0.696). The best predictor is aspect 5, teamwork and participation. Using the stepwise selection method, the impact was at a high level, equal to 69.5% (R²= 0.695). The best predictor was aspect 5, teamwork and participation.