https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ijdar/issue/feedInternational Journal of Development Administration Research2026-06-01T00:00:00+07:00Asst.Prof.Dr.Natnaporn AeknarajindawatTouch_life@outlook.co.thOpen Journal Systems<p><strong>International Journal of Development Administration Research</strong></p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>Aims and Scope</strong></p> <p>The <em>International Journal of Development Administration Research</em> is dedicated to advancing high-quality scholarly research and fostering rigorous intellectual discourse in the broad and evolving fields of Humanities and Social Sciences. The Journal serves as an international academic platform that supports the dissemination of innovative knowledge, critical perspectives, and interdisciplinary approaches addressing contemporary social, administrative, and developmental issues.</p> <p>The Journal aims to promote excellence in research by publishing contributions that demonstrate strong theoretical grounding, methodological rigor, and analytical depth. It seeks to bridge the gap between theory and practice by encouraging studies that generate meaningful insights for academic advancement, policy development, and practical application in both public and private sectors.</p> <p>In particular, the Journal prioritizes research that contributes to:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Theoretical advancement</strong>, through the development, refinement, or critical evaluation of concepts, frameworks, and paradigms in social and humanistic inquiry</li> <li><strong>Empirical contribution</strong>, through robust qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods research that provides evidence-based insights</li> <li><strong>Policy relevance</strong>, by addressing real-world challenges and informing decision-making processes at local, national, regional, or global levels</li> <li><strong>Practical application</strong>, by offering actionable knowledge applicable to governance, administration, management, and development practices</li> </ul> <p>The Journal strongly encourages <strong>interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research</strong>, recognizing that complex societal challenges require integrated perspectives across disciplines. Submissions that incorporate <strong>comparative, cross-cultural, or transnational approaches</strong> are particularly welcomed, as they enhance understanding of diverse contexts and promote global knowledge exchange.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Scope of the Journal</strong></p> <p>The Journal publishes scholarly works across a wide range of thematic areas, including but not limited to:</p> <ol> <li><strong> Development Administration</strong></li> </ol> <p>Research addressing governance, planning, implementation, and evaluation of development policies and programs, particularly in emerging and developing contexts.</p> <ol start="2"> <li><strong> Public Administration and Public Policy</strong></li> </ol> <p>Studies examining public sector management, policy formulation and analysis, institutional performance, and administrative reform.</p> <ol start="3"> <li><strong> Management and Organizational Studies</strong></li> </ol> <p>Research on organizational behavior, leadership, strategic management, human resource development, and institutional dynamics in both public and private sectors.</p> <ol start="4"> <li><strong> Tourism and Service Industry Studies</strong></li> </ol> <p>Studies focusing on tourism development, service management, hospitality industries, and their socio-economic and cultural impacts.</p> <ol start="5"> <li><strong> Critical Theory and Social Thought</strong></li> </ol> <p>Theoretical and philosophical inquiries that critically examine social structures, power relations, ideologies, and cultural dynamics.</p> <ol start="6"> <li><strong> Governance, Sustainability, and Development Studies</strong></li> </ol> <p>Research on sustainable development, environmental governance, social responsibility, and global development challenges.</p> <ol start="7"> <li><strong> Interdisciplinary Research in Humanities and Social Sciences</strong></li> </ol> <p>Innovative studies that integrate multiple disciplines to address complex societal issues and generate new knowledge frameworks.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Types of Contributions</strong></p> <p>The Journal welcomes original and unpublished manuscripts that demonstrate:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Methodological rigor</strong>, including clearly defined research design, appropriate data collection and analysis, and reproducibility where applicable</li> <li><strong>Theoretical clarity</strong>, with well-articulated concepts and frameworks</li> <li><strong>Analytical depth</strong>, providing critical interpretation and meaningful discussion of findings</li> <li><strong>Scholarly originality</strong>, contributing new knowledge or perspectives to the field</li> <li><strong>Practical relevance</strong>, offering implications for policy, practice, or future research</li> </ul> <p>Submissions may focus on issues at local, national, regional, or international levels, and the Journal particularly values comparative and transnational studies that contribute to global academic dialogue.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Types of Articles Published</strong></p> <p>The journal publishes the following categories of manuscripts:</p> <ol> <li><strong> Research Articles</strong></li> </ol> <p>Full-length original research papers that present novel empirical findings, theoretical contributions, methodological advancements, or significant reinterpretations of existing knowledge. Research articles must demonstrate a clear research design, robust methodology, critical engagement with relevant literature, and well-supported conclusions.</p> <ol start="2"> <li><strong> Academic Articles</strong></li> </ol> <p>Scholarly contributions that provide conceptual frameworks, theoretical syntheses, critical analyses, or systematic reviews of literature. These articles should offer substantial intellectual contributions and advance scholarly debates within the relevant field.</p> <p>All submissions must adhere to internationally recognized academic standards and ethical research practices.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Objectives</strong></p> <p>The journal pursues the following objectives:</p> <ol> <li>To disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed academic research from scholars, researchers, and graduate students both within and outside the institution.</li> <li>To promote academic excellence and strengthen research capacity by providing a credible and internationally oriented publication platform.</li> <li>To foster interdisciplinary dialogue and intellectual collaboration among scholars in the Humanities and Social Sciences.</li> <li>To contribute to evidence-based policymaking, sustainable development, and societal advancement through the publication of research with practical and policy implications.</li> <li>To enhance the international visibility and academic impact of research conducted in the region and beyond.</li> </ol> <p> </p> <p><strong>Publication Frequency</strong></p> <p>Beginning in 2026, the journal will be published according to the following schedule:</p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>Issue 1: January–March</strong></p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Issue 2: April–June</strong></p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Issue 3: July–September</strong></p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Issue 4: October–December</strong></p> </li> </ul> <p>The journal maintains a consistent publication schedule to ensure reliability, academic continuity, and compliance with recognized indexing standards.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Peer Review Policy</strong></p> <p>All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subject to a rigorous, transparent, and ethical editorial and peer-review process to ensure academic quality, originality, methodological soundness, and compliance with publication ethics. The journal applies a <strong>double-blind peer review</strong> model to uphold impartiality and fairness, whereby the identities of both authors and reviewers are strictly concealed throughout the review process.</p> <ol> <li><strong> Editorial Screening (Initial Assessment)</strong></li> </ol> <p>Upon submission, each manuscript is first evaluated by the Editorial Board through an initial screening process. This stage aims to determine whether the manuscript is suitable to proceed to external peer review. The Editorial Board assesses the following:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Relevance to the journal’s aims and scope</strong></li> <li><strong>Compliance with author guidelines</strong> (format, structure, referencing style, completeness of required sections)</li> <li><strong>Academic merit and clarity</strong> (research focus, contribution, logical coherence, language quality sufficient for review)</li> <li><strong>Ethical compliance</strong> (research ethics, consent where applicable, proper citation, avoidance of harmful or discriminatory content)</li> <li><strong>Originality assurance</strong> including preliminary checks for duplication or overlap</li> </ul> <p>Manuscripts that do not meet the journal’s basic requirements may be returned to authors for technical correction or rejected at this stage to ensure efficient and responsible use of reviewer resources.</p> <ol start="2"> <li><strong> Plagiarism and Similarity Screening</strong></li> </ol> <p>To safeguard academic integrity, the journal may screen submissions using plagiarism and similarity detection tools. Where concerns arise, the Editorial Board may:</p> <ul> <li>request clarification or revision from the author(s),</li> <li>reject the manuscript due to unethical overlap, or</li> <li>proceed with caution when overlap is legitimate and appropriately cited (e.g., methods descriptions), depending on editorial judgment.</li> </ul> <ol start="3"> <li><strong> Double-Blind Peer Review Process</strong></li> </ol> <p>Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent for external evaluation by <strong>at least two independent reviewers</strong> who possess relevant expertise in the manuscript’s subject area and methodology. The journal follows a double-blind process:</p> <ul> <li>Reviewers do not know the identity of the author(s).</li> <li>Author(s) do not know the identity of the reviewers.</li> </ul> <p>This ensures evaluations are based solely on academic merit, without bias related to affiliation, nationality, seniority, gender, or personal relationships.</p> <p><strong>Reviewer Selection and Independence</strong></p> <p>Reviewers are selected based on:</p> <ul> <li>disciplinary expertise and research experience,</li> <li>suitability to evaluate the manuscript’s methodology and scope, and</li> <li>absence of conflicts of interest.</li> </ul> <p>Reviewers must declare potential conflicts of interest (e.g., collaboration, institutional ties, personal relationships, financial interests). If a conflict exists, the reviewer must decline the assignment.</p> <ol start="4"> <li><strong> Review Criteria</strong></li> </ol> <p>Reviewers are requested to provide constructive, evidence-based feedback and recommendations. Core evaluation criteria typically include:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Originality and contribution to knowledge</strong></li> <li><strong>Relevance to the journal’s scope and audience</strong></li> <li><strong>Theoretical grounding and conceptual clarity</strong></li> <li><strong>Methodological rigor and appropriateness</strong> (design, sampling, instruments, validity/reliability or trustworthiness, analysis procedures)</li> <li><strong>Quality of data analysis and interpretation</strong></li> <li><strong>Strength of discussion and implications</strong> (academic, policy, practical relevance)</li> <li><strong>Quality of presentation</strong> (structure, clarity, referencing accuracy, ethical reporting)</li> </ul> <ol start="5"> <li><strong> Review Outcomes and Editorial Decisions</strong></li> </ol> <p>Based on reviewers’ reports and the Editorial Board’s assessment, a manuscript may receive one of the following decisions:</p> <ol> <li><strong>Accept</strong> (rare at first round)</li> <li><strong>Minor Revision</strong> (acceptance likely after small corrections)</li> <li><strong>Major Revision</strong> (substantial changes required; re-review may be needed)</li> <li><strong>Reject</strong> (insufficient quality, scope mismatch, or major methodological/ethical concerns)</li> </ol> <p>The final decision rests with the Editorial Board. The journal may appoint additional reviewers in special cases, such as:</p> <ul> <li>when reviewer recommendations significantly diverge,</li> <li>when specialized expertise is required, or</li> <li>when ethical or methodological concerns require further assessment.</li> </ul> <ol start="6"> <li><strong> Revision Process</strong></li> </ol> <p>When revisions are requested, authors must:</p> <ul> <li>respond to each reviewer comment systematically,</li> <li>submit a revised manuscript with clear tracked changes (where applicable), and</li> <li>provide a response letter explaining how each issue was addressed or justified.</li> </ul> <p>For major revisions, the revised manuscript may be returned to the original reviewers for re-evaluation to confirm that concerns have been adequately resolved.</p> <ol start="7"> <li><strong> Confidentiality and Ethical Conduct</strong></li> </ol> <p>All submitted manuscripts and review communications are treated as confidential. Manuscripts are shared only with individuals directly involved in editorial management and peer review. Reviewers are prohibited from:</p> <ul> <li>sharing the manuscript with others without permission,</li> <li>using unpublished content for personal advantage, or</li> <li>copying or distributing any part of the manuscript.</li> </ul> <p>Editors and reviewers must maintain professionalism and avoid discriminatory, inappropriate, or personal remarks in the review process.</p> <ol start="8"> <li><strong> Originality and Exclusive Submission</strong></li> </ol> <p>The journal accepts only manuscripts that are:</p> <ul> <li><strong>original</strong>, not previously published in any form that constitutes prior publication, and</li> <li><strong>not under consideration</strong> by another journal at the time of submission.</li> </ul> <p>Authors are required to confirm exclusivity and originality at submission. Failure to comply may result in rejection and may be treated as ethical misconduct.</p> <ol start="9"> <li><strong> Editorial Rights and Publication Scheduling</strong></li> </ol> <p>The Editorial Board reserves the right to:</p> <ul> <li>request editorial revisions for clarity, format, or consistency,</li> <li>make minor editorial adjustments that do not affect scholarly content, and</li> <li>determine the order and timing of publication based on academic merit, thematic fit, review outcomes, and editorial priorities.</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Publication Ethics</strong></p> <p>The journal upholds strict publication ethics in accordance with internationally recognized standards for academic publishing. Authors are expected to ensure originality, proper citation, transparency in data reporting, and disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest. Any form of plagiarism, data fabrication, falsification, or unethical research conduct will result in immediate rejection or retraction.</p> <p>Reviewers are required to conduct objective, confidential, and constructive evaluations. Editors are responsible for ensuring fairness, transparency, and integrity throughout the editorial process.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Article Processing Fee</strong></p> <p>Upon formal acceptance of a manuscript for publication, authors are required to pay an Article Processing Charge (APC) of <strong>6,000 Thai Baht (Six Thousand Baht) per article</strong>. The fee is charged only after the manuscript has successfully completed the peer-review process and has been officially accepted by the Editorial Board.</p> <p><strong>Payment Details:</strong></p> <p>Kasikorn Bank (KBank), Thailand<br />Account Number: 250-2-75039-1</p> <p>Authors must upload proof of payment (e.g., transfer slip or transaction confirmation screenshot) through the designated submission or discussion system on the journal’s website.</p> <p> </p>https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ijdar/article/view/287167Governing Public–Private Artificial Intelligence Partnerships: Balancing Public Value and Commercial Interests in the Digital State2026-05-05T10:00:45+07:00George Samermitpianghathaik@gmail.comSasawat Pengpaepianghathaik@gmail.comPatcharaporn Rattanawaropaspianghathaik@gmail.comUbon Pun-ubonpianghathaik@gmail.com<p> This study examines the governance of Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) within the context of the digital state. As governments increasingly rely on AI-driven systems for public service delivery, risk assessment, and administrative decision-making, collaboration with private technology firms has moved beyond conventional outsourcing arrangements into the core architecture of public authority. Unlike traditional PPPs focused on infrastructure or service provision, AI-enabled partnerships embed private actors within algorithmic decision infrastructures that directly shape public outcomes. Drawing on qualitative policy analysis and documentary research, this study integrates PPP governance, algorithmic governance, and public value theory. The findings demonstrate that AI-driven partnerships reconfigure PPPs from contractual risk allocation toward the co-production of algorithmic authority. Data asymmetry, technical opacity, and commercial incentives generate structural tensions between market efficiency and the preservation of public value, including transparency, accountability, equity, and legitimacy. The study proposes an integrated governance framework encompassing four dimensions: contract governance, data governance, algorithmic transparency and auditability, and public value accountability. By conceptualizing Public–Private AI Partnerships as a form of co-production of algorithmic authority, this research extends PPP theory into the domain of digital governance and highlights the institutional conditions necessary to sustain democratic legitimacy in AI-enabled public administration.</p>2026-06-01T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Development Administration Researchhttps://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ijdar/article/view/286938Digital Transformation in Vietnamese Museums: Artificial Intelligence, Visitor Experience, and Sustainable Cultural Tourism Development2026-05-05T09:49:59+07:00Le Duy Hoangjackyhoang007@gmail.com<p>In the context of digital transformation reshaping cultural institutions worldwide, the museum system in Vietnam has also increasingly adopted digital technologies in exhibition practices, management, and heritage interpretation. However, existing studies have primarily focused on the technical application of digital technologies in museums, while the role of digital transformation as an integrated strategy connecting technology, public experience, and sustainable heritage development remains insufficiently examined. In response to this gap, this study proposes a theoretical approach that conceptualizes digital transformation in museums as a strategic process integrating artificial intelligence (AI) with interactive technologies such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) to enhance visitor engagement and experiential interaction. This study employs a qualitative research approach, combining literature review, content analysis, and comparative case-study analysis of representative museums in Vietnam. The findings identify three major trends in the digital transformation process: (1) the increasing digitization of artifacts and development of digital databases; (2) the expansion of immersive and interactive experiences through VR and AR technologies; and (3) the integration of artificial intelligence into museum operations, including interpretation services, data management, and visitor support systems. In addition, statistical data from 2023 to mid-2025 indicate a steady increase in visitor numbers at museums adopting digital technologies, although various contextual factors also influence this trend. The findings further demonstrate that digital transformation, when implemented as an integrated strategic approach rather than merely as a technical tool, not only improves operational efficiency but also strengthens cultural communication capacity, expands accessibility to cultural heritage, and contributes to the promotion of sustainable cultural tourism development. The article simultaneously proposes an integrated framework that combines technology, heritage interpretation, and sustainable cultural tourism within contemporary museum studies. Based on this perspective, the study recommends directions for developing integrated and sustainable digital museum models in Vietnam. It provides practical references for museum managers, policymakers, and researchers within the broader Southeast Asian context.</p>2026-06-01T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Development Administration Researchhttps://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ijdar/article/view/286829Bridging the Gap: The Need for Applying Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Private Kindergarten Administration in Bangkok under the Preschool Education Association of Thailand (P.E.A.T.)2026-05-05T09:48:19+07:00Kunlayanee Bunyarakshilovekb31@gmail.comAnutsara Suwanwongilovekb31@gmail.com<p>This study adopts the Gap Analysis Framework and the Modified Priority Needs Index (PNIModified), conceptually derived from the needs assessment approach of Witkin and Altschuld (1995). Data were collected during the Academic Year 2025. The contribution of this study lies in identifying AI needs within kindergarten administration, a context distinct from K–12 and higher education because AI implementation must balance pedagogical support, child development, ethical safeguards, and parent engagement. This working paper investigates the need for applying Artificial Intelligence (AI) in private kindergarten administration in Bangkok under the Preschool Education Association of Thailand (P.E.A.T.). Using a quantitative research design grounded in the Gap Analysis Framework, the study examines discrepancies between current and desired conditions across six administrative dimensions: Administrative Efficiency, Data Management and Analytics, Communication and Engagement, Instructional Support, Quality Assurance and Compliance, and Change Readiness and Professional Development. Data were collected from 175 administrators and analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Priority Needs Index (PNI<sub>Modified</sub>). The findings reveal a substantial gap between current implementation (x̄ = 2.55) and desired conditions (x̄ = 4.58), indicating a strong demand for systematic AI integration. Instructional Support emerged as the highest priority (PNI<sub>Modified </sub>= 1.01), followed by Quality Assurance and Compliance (0.98) and Data Management and Analytics (0.97). The results suggest that AI is perceived not merely as a tool for efficiency, but as a strategic mechanism for enhancing pedagogical quality, strengthening governance, and enabling data-driven decision-making. The study highlights the need for systemic alignment, infrastructure development, and professional capacity building to support sustainable AI adoption in early childhood education administration. The contribution of this study lies in identifying AI needs within kindergarten administration, a context that differs substantially from K–12 and higher education settings because AI implementation must balance administrative efficiency with child development principles, ethical safeguards, and parent engagement. The findings, therefore, contribute not only to educational administration literature but also to emerging policy discussions concerning responsible AI integration in early childhood education.</p>2026-06-01T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Development Administration Researchhttps://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ijdar/article/view/287330Political Literacy in Thailand’s Pre-Primary and Primary Education Curricula in the Digital Age2026-05-11T07:58:50+07:00Veera Lertsompornveera.le@up.ac.th<p>Political literacy has gained paramount importance in the digital era, as young learners require not only civic virtues but also the capacity to critically engage with mediated information. This study analyzes the integration of political literacy within Thailand's pre-primary and primary education curricula, incorporating insights from educators and academic experts to guide curriculum enhancement. The study employed a qualitative design, integrating document analysis of the Early Childhood Education Curriculum B.E. 2560 (2017) and the Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (2008), interviews with 24 educators in Northern Thailand, and a focus group of six academic experts. The analysis was informed by four elements of political literacy: political knowledge, political skills, political attitudes, and competencies relevant to the digital age. Research indicates that political literacy predominantly manifests in implicit forms via moral development, social responsibility, and democratic coexistence, whereas explicit political knowledge, critical political skills, and competencies pertinent to the digital age are notably deficient, particularly in areas such as source evaluation, misinformation detection, digital verification, and awareness of AI- and algorithm-driven information contexts. The study emphasizes the necessity for a clearer and developmentally suitable curriculum design and adds to the sparse scholarship on political literacy in preprimary and primary education, especially in Northern Thailand.</p>2026-06-01T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Development Administration Researchhttps://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ijdar/article/view/287377Development of a Participatory Community Animal Health System under the One Health Approach through Veterinary Volunteer Mobile Services in Udon Thani Province, Thailand2026-05-25T16:44:06+07:00Chonlawit Yuvajitadrchonlawitfbs@gmail.com<p> This study examined the outcomes of a participatory community animal health system developed under the One Health approach, through veterinary volunteer mobile services that supported the Princess Mother’s Medical Volunteer Foundation in Udon Thani Province, Thailand. A community-based evaluative case-study design was employed using secondary project records, mobile service logs, household-level evaluation summaries, community participation records, and post-project sustainability indicators. The intervention was implemented over a 12-month period through repeated veterinary mobile service rounds, household-level consultation, vaccination, deworming, animal health screening, community education, referral support, and the establishment of local animal health networks. The project database covered 4 subdistricts, 8 villages, 240 target households, and 612 animals. During implementation, 14 mobile service rounds were conducted in 7 service villages, generating 762 cumulative household-service visits and 2,819 cumulative animal-service contacts or follow-up care instances. After 12 months, 214 households, representing 89.2% of the target households, had accessed animal health services at least once. Preventive animal health practices improved substantially: annual vaccination behavior increased from 30.0% to 83.8%, regular deworming from 22.5% to 77.5%, and annual animal health check-up behavior from 16.3% to 72.1%. Knowledge and practices related to zoonotic disease prevention also improved, including rabies transmission awareness from 48.7% to 95.4%, appropriate response after animal bites from 32.1% to 90.8%, and reporting abnormal animal conditions from 27.9% to 85.0%. The system generated wider social and economic outcomes. Average annual household expenditure on animal treatment decreased from 2,850 to 1,420 baht, while access to veterinary consultation increased from 22.1% to 88.3%. Community animal health leaders increased from 3 to 29 persons, and early animal illness reporting systems expanded from 1 of 8 villages to all 8 villages. Post-project sustainability indicators showed continued animal health activities, active local leaders, sustained vaccination and deworming practices, and ongoing coordination with local administrative organizations. These findings suggest that veterinary volunteer mobile services, when designed as a repeated participatory community system rather than a one-time service event, can strengthen household animal health practices, improve zoonotic disease prevention behavior, reduce access and economic burdens, and support shared community–professional One Health implementation in rural areas. The model provides practical implications for community-based veterinary public health, rural service equity, and integrated human–animal–environment health governance.</p>2026-06-02T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Development Administration Research