Causal relationship model as an innovative educational establishment
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this research was to develop and validate a causal relationship model as an innovative educational institution. It was quantitative research using the concept of an innovative educational institution as a research framework. The research area was a basic educational establishment under the Office of the Basic Education Commission. The sample consisted of 435 educational institutions. The data source was one administrator or representative of each school.
A simple random sampling was used. The research tool was a questionnaire on the status of an innovative educational institution. Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis. The results revealed that the causal relationship model of innovative educational institutions was examined for quality using structural validity through confirmatory factor analysis. The first step was fit with the empirical data, where 2 = 635.28, p = 0.00, GFI = 0.83, AGFI = 0.74, CFI = 0.83, RMR = 0.031 and RMSEA = 0.14.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bearden, W. O., Sharma, S., & Teel, J. E. (1982). Sample size effects on chi square and other statistics used in evaluating causal models. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 425−430.
Bollen, K.A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 256−259.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY and London, UK: Teachers College Press.
Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2006). Design-based research in science education: One step towards methodology. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 4, 54-68.
Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 2nd ed. New York: Guildford.
Laundy, P. (2006). An Innovation Discipline Model. Retrieved August 10, 2022, from http://www. bpminstitute.org/articles/article/article/an- innovation-discipline-model.html
Likert, Rensis. (1967). The Method of Constructing and Attitude Scale. In Reading in Fishbeic, M (Ed.), Attitude Theory and Measurement. New York: Wiley & Son.
McKeown, M. (2008). The Truth About Innovation. London: Prentice Hall.
NCCBE. (2004). National core curriculum for basic education 2004: national core curriculum for basic education intended for pupils in compulsory education. Helsinki: National Board of Education.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston, MA: Academic Press.
Office of the Education Council (ONEC). (2018). The National Scheme of Education B.E. 2560-2579 (2017-2036). Retrieved August 10, 2022, from https:// edubrights.com/resource/2018/11/27/ the-national-scheme-of education-b-e-2560-2579-2017-2036/
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2018). National Strategy (2017-2036). Retrieved August 10, 2022, from http://nscr. nesdb.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ National-StrategyEng-Final-25-OCT-2019.pdf
Pagaura, A. (2020). Innovative leadership attributes of school admin istrators in the Philippines: Implications for educational man agement. Interdisciplinary Research Review, 15(2),1-7.
Phonmanee, W. and Ariratana, W. (2019). The development of adminis tration model for creating learning management innovations in secondary school under the office of the Basic Education Com mission. Journal of Educational Administration, Khon Kaen Universit, 15(1),36-50.
Reeves, T. (2006). Design-based research from a technology perspective. In J. V. D. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design-based Research (pp. 52– 66). New York: Routledge.
Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323-338.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2014). UNESCO Education Strategy 2014–2021. Retrieved August 10, 2022, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/ pf0000231288.
